netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 04/20] zinc: ChaCha20 x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHmME9oARODJsrDbcNK7A22KrTRJP945hj9+oCJtQM6OjGF4Ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Sep 2018 04:14:31 +0200
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Samuel Neves <sneves@....uc.pt>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>,
        Andy Polyakov <appro@...nssl.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 04/20] zinc: ChaCha20 x86_64 implementation

Hi Thomas,

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 12:30 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> I'm a bit confused by this SOB chain. So above you write that it's from
> Andy Polakovs implementation and Samuel did the changes. But here it seems
> you are the main author. If Samuel just did some modifications then you
> want to use the Co-developed-by tag along with his SOB.

Thanks, I'll use that tag.

>
> Also I'd recommend to add a Originally-by or Based-on-code-from: Andy
> Polyakov tag. Both are not formal tags but widely in use for attributions.

Great idea.

>
> > +++ b/lib/zinc/chacha20/chacha20-x86_64-glue.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
>
> Please put that into a separate one liner comment. Also this should be
> 'GPL-2.0[+] or MIT' I think.

I had that originally, but changed it to just MIT, since MIT is a
subset of GPL-2.0. And looking at tree repo, it appears this is what
others do too.

Jason