netdev - Re: [net-next 00/14][pull request] 40GbE Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2018-09-18

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...hat.com>
To:     jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com,
        jogreene@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 00/14][pull request] 40GbE Intel Wired LAN Driver
 Updates 2018-09-18

From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 15:37:17 -0700

> This series contains changes to i40evf so that it becomes a more
> generic virtual function driver for current and future silicon.
> 
> While doing the rename of i40evf to a more generic name of iavf,
> we also put the driver on a severe diet due to how much of the
> code was unneeded or was unused.  The outcome is a lean and mean
> virtual function driver that continues to work on existing 40GbE
> (i40e) virtual devices and prepped for future supported devices,
> like the 100GbE (ice) virtual devices.
> 
> This solves 2 issues we saw coming or were already present, the
> first was constant code duplication happening with i40e/i40evf,
> when much of the duplicate code in the i40evf was not used or was
> not needed.  The second was to remove the future confusion of why
> future VF devices that were not considered "40GbE" only devices
> were supported by i40evf.
> 
> The thought is that iavf will be the virtual function driver for
> all future devices, so it should have a "generic" name to properly
> represent that it is the VF driver for multiple generations of
> devices.
> 
> The last patch in this series is unreleated to the iavf conversion
> and just has to do with a MODULE_LICENSE correction.
> 
> Known Caveats:
> Existing user space configurations may have to change, but the module
> alias in patch 1 helps a bit here.

Ok, let's see how this goes.

Pulled, thanks.