lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1537384189.10305.58.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Wed, 19 Sep 2018 21:09:49 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] netlink: prepare validate extack setting for
 recursion

On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 16:08 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> 
> > If it fails and returns (nested and all) on the first failure it should
> > be fine. I was thinking something like this (whitespace damaged on paste):
> 
> This will avoid the situation that we were discussing in the older
> thread, btw.

I think it only avoids the part where we have to worry about "have I
already set this" - which is David's point AFAICT.

I'll reply over to your other email (as I already started writing a
reply there)

johannes

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ