[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdX_moKNGweZm9SORWq6HEPEq5qBcPmSX-0fVTxsMez1Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:48:44 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: linkwatch: add check for netdevice
being present to linkwatch_do_dev
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:56 PM Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> wrote:
> When bringing down the netdevice (incl. detaching it) and calling
> netif_carrier_off directly or indirectly the latter triggers an
> asynchronous linkwatch event.
> This linkwatch event eventually may fail to access chip registers in
> the ndo_get_stats/ndo_get_stats64 callback because the device isn't
> accessible any longer, see call trace in [0].
>
> To prevent this scenario don't check for IFF_UP only, but also make
> sure that the netdevice is present.
>
> [0] https://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2018/03/15/62
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Survived 100 suspend/resume cycles on sh73a0/kzm9g and r8a73a4/ape6evm.
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists