[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180920112202.9181-3-leon@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:21:59 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@...adcom.com>,
Steve Wise <swise@...lsio.com>, Lijun Ou <oulijun@...wei.com>,
Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>,
Ariel Elior <Ariel.Elior@...ium.com>,
Christian Benvenuti <benve@...co.com>,
Adit Ranadive <aditr@...are.com>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH rdma-next 2/5] net/smc: Use IB device index instead of name
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
IB device name is not stable and will be possible to rename in the
following patches, update SMC code to use IB index as a stable
identification.
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
---
net/smc/smc_diag.c | 6 +++---
net/smc/smc_pnet.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_diag.c b/net/smc/smc_diag.c
index dbf64a93d68a..ba8b5a5671ec 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_diag.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_diag.c
@@ -156,9 +156,9 @@ static int __smc_diag_dump(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
.lnk[0].link_id = smc->conn.lgr->lnk[0].link_id,
};
- memcpy(linfo.lnk[0].ibname,
- smc->conn.lgr->lnk[0].smcibdev->ibdev->name,
- sizeof(smc->conn.lgr->lnk[0].smcibdev->ibdev->name));
+ ib_device_get_name(smc->conn.lgr->lnk[0].smcibdev->ibdev,
+ linfo.lnk[0].ibname);
+
smc_gid_be16_convert(linfo.lnk[0].gid,
smc->conn.lgr->lnk[0].gid);
smc_gid_be16_convert(linfo.lnk[0].peer_gid,
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_pnet.c b/net/smc/smc_pnet.c
index 01c6ce042a1c..67aec5ce6112 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_pnet.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_pnet.c
@@ -70,15 +70,14 @@ struct smc_pnetentry {
u8 ib_port;
};
-/* Check if two RDMA device entries are identical. Use device name and port
+/* Check if two RDMA device entries are identical. Use device index and port
* number for comparison.
*/
-static bool smc_pnet_same_ibname(struct smc_pnetentry *pnetelem, char *ibname,
- u8 ibport)
+static bool smc_pnet_same_ibindex(struct smc_pnetentry *pnetelem, u32 ibindex,
+ u8 ibport)
{
return pnetelem->ib_port == ibport &&
- !strncmp(pnetelem->smcibdev->ibdev->name, ibname,
- sizeof(pnetelem->smcibdev->ibdev->name));
+ pnetelem->smcibdev->ibdev->index == ibindex;
}
/* Find a pnetid in the pnet table.
@@ -179,9 +178,9 @@ static int smc_pnet_enter(struct smc_pnetentry *new_pnetelem)
sizeof(new_pnetelem->pnet_name)) ||
!strncmp(pnetelem->ndev->name, new_pnetelem->ndev->name,
sizeof(new_pnetelem->ndev->name)) ||
- smc_pnet_same_ibname(pnetelem,
- new_pnetelem->smcibdev->ibdev->name,
- new_pnetelem->ib_port)) {
+ smc_pnet_same_ibindex(pnetelem,
+ new_pnetelem->smcibdev->ibdev->index,
+ new_pnetelem->ib_port)) {
dev_put(pnetelem->ndev);
goto found;
}
@@ -227,10 +226,11 @@ static struct smc_ib_device *smc_pnet_find_ib(char *ib_name)
spin_lock(&smc_ib_devices.lock);
list_for_each_entry(ibdev, &smc_ib_devices.list, list) {
- if (!strncmp(ibdev->ibdev->name, ib_name,
- sizeof(ibdev->ibdev->name))) {
+ char name[IB_DEVICE_NAME_MAX] = {};
+
+ ib_device_get_name(ibdev->ibdev, name);
+ if (!strncmp(name, ib_name, IB_DEVICE_NAME_MAX))
goto out;
- }
}
ibdev = NULL;
out:
@@ -267,6 +267,11 @@ static int smc_pnet_fill_entry(struct net *net, struct smc_pnetentry *pnetelem,
goto error;
rc = -EINVAL;
+ /* NOTE !!!: Sadly enough, but this is part of ABI.
+ * From day one, the accesses are performed with device names and not
+ * device indexes for both ETH and IB. It means that this function isn't
+ * reliable after device renaming.
+ */
if (!tb[SMC_PNETID_IBNAME])
goto error;
rc = -ENOENT;
--
2.14.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists