[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180920182252.13457-3-shahed.shaikh@cavium.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 11:22:51 -0700
From: Shahed Shaikh <shahed.shaikh@...ium.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <Ariel.Elior@...ium.com>,
<Dept-EngEverestLinuxL2@...ium.com>,
Shahed Shaikh <Shahed.Shaikh@...ium.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/3] bnx2x: Ignore bandwidth attention in single function mode
From: Shahed Shaikh <Shahed.Shaikh@...ium.com>
This is a workaround for FW bug -
MFW generates bandwidth attention in single function mode, which
is only expected to be generated in multi function mode.
This undesired attention in SF mode results in incorrect HW
configuration and resulting into Tx timeout.
Signed-off-by: Shahed Shaikh <Shahed.Shaikh@...ium.com>
Signed-off-by: Ariel Elior <ariel.elior@...ium.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c
index faf64ba..16f64c6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c
@@ -3536,6 +3536,16 @@ static void bnx2x_drv_info_iscsi_stat(struct bnx2x *bp)
*/
static void bnx2x_config_mf_bw(struct bnx2x *bp)
{
+ /* Workaround for MFW bug.
+ * MFW is not supposed to generate BW attention in
+ * single function mode.
+ */
+ if (!IS_MF(bp)) {
+ DP(BNX2X_MSG_MCP,
+ "Ignoring MF BW config in single function mode\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
if (bp->link_vars.link_up) {
bnx2x_cmng_fns_init(bp, true, CMNG_FNS_MINMAX);
bnx2x_link_sync_notify(bp);
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists