lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVeiF0OX=z7i6ohzshOvh7x1TTKh+TDn0c0xucpBCRYxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Sep 2018 12:08:32 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@...du.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next-next][v2] netlink: avoid to allocate full skb when
 sending to many devices

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 1:58 AM Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com> wrote:
>
> if skb->head is vmalloc address, when this skb is delivered, full
> allocation for this skb is required, if there are many devices,
> the full allocation will be called for every devices

So why do you in practice need many netlink tap devices?

tap devices are now isolated in each netns, so at max you need
one tap device per netns in practice.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ