netdev - Re: Ping: [PATCH 0/3] xen-netback: hash mapping hanling adjustments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180924.094920.655625438524720848.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     JBeulich@...e.com
Cc:     paul.durrant@...rix.com, wei.liu2@...rix.com,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ping: [PATCH 0/3] xen-netback: hash mapping hanling adjustments

From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 01:43:50 -0600

>>>> On 11.09.18 at 12:16, <wei.liu2@...rix.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 02:12:07AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> >>> On 28.08.18 at 16:54,  wrote:
>>> > First and foremost the fix for XSA-270. On top of that further changes
>>> > which looked desirable to me while investigating that XSA.
>>> > 
>>> > 1: fix input validation in xenvif_set_hash_mapping()
>>> > 2: validate queue numbers in xenvif_set_hash_mapping()
>>> > 3: handle page straddling in xenvif_set_hash_mapping()
>>> > 
>>> > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
>>> 
>>> What is the way forward here? I've got R-b-s from Paul for all three
>>> patches, and a minor change request on patch 2 from Wei. I'm not
>>> really certain what to do in this case (hints appreciated), but could
>>> at least the security fix (patch 1) be applied immediately?
>> 
>> If you happen to resend, please make the adjustment; otherwise I'm fine
>> with the patches as they are. I don't want to block useful things on
>> cosmetic issues.
> 
> Dave? I notice none of the patches is in 4.19-rc5, not even the security
> fix, the advisory for which had gone public over a month ago.

If it's not in my patchwork queue, you have to resend the series and
make it clear that it should be applied to the networking tree by
putting "[PATCH net N/M]" in the Subject lines.

Thank you.