[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN6PR1101MB2130D18F03C79BC1E54C9FBAE7160@BN6PR1101MB2130.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:32:56 +0000
From: <Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>
To: <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
<steve.glendinning@...well.net>, <keescook@...omium.org>,
<akurz@...la.de>, <hayeswang@...ltek.com>,
<kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>, <grundler@...omium.org>,
<zhongjiang@...wei.com>, <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
<ran.wang_1@....com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net 3/7] lan78xx: Check for supported Wake-on-LAN modes
Hi Florian,
> >> + if (pdata->wol == 0)
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> > It will make function return when disabling WOL.
>
> Huh, yes, good point.
>
> > Is there other place handling this scenario?
>
> How do you mean?
>
I meant there is another path I might miss when disabling WOL
than this xxx_set_wol().
Thanks
Woojung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists