[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVw2kOtWdup9Q-c0wxsNCx-PtSMPhKkQ15R=8nwiJmhfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 14:18:19 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bond: take rcu lock in bond_poll_controller
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 1:08 PM Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Callers of bond_for_each_slave_rcu are expected to hold the rcu lock,
> otherwise a trace like below is shown
Interesting, netpoll_send_skb_on_dev() already assumes RCU read lock
when it calls rcu_dereference_bh()...
I wonder how it can't catch such a warning before the one you reported.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists