[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5BA9EF5502000078001EB760@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:18:29 -0600
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: "Paul Durrant" <paul.durrant@...rix.com>,
"Wei Liu" <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
"xen-devel" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ping: [PATCH 0/3] xen-netback: hash mapping hanling
adjustments
>>> On 24.09.18 at 18:49, <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 01:43:50 -0600
>
>> Dave? I notice none of the patches is in 4.19-rc5, not even the security
>> fix, the advisory for which had gone public over a month ago.
>
> If it's not in my patchwork queue, you have to resend the series and
> make it clear that it should be applied to the networking tree by
> putting "[PATCH net N/M]" in the Subject lines.
I'm sure this requirement is documented somewhere, but some searching
in Documentation/process/ did not turn up anything. For the occasional
contributor, such extra tag addition requirements are pretty unhelpful.
Anyway - I've done the resend, hopefully now meeting the requirements
to avoid further delays.
Jan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists