lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5BA9EF5502000078001EB760@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Sep 2018 02:18:29 -0600
From:   "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:     <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     "Paul Durrant" <paul.durrant@...rix.com>,
        "Wei Liu" <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
        "xen-devel" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ping: [PATCH 0/3] xen-netback: hash mapping hanling
 adjustments

>>> On 24.09.18 at 18:49, <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 01:43:50 -0600
> 
>> Dave? I notice none of the patches is in 4.19-rc5, not even the security
>> fix, the advisory for which had gone public over a month ago.
> 
> If it's not in my patchwork queue, you have to resend the series and
> make it clear that it should be applied to the networking tree by
> putting "[PATCH net N/M]" in the Subject lines.

I'm sure this requirement is documented somewhere, but some searching
in Documentation/process/ did not turn up anything. For the occasional
contributor, such extra tag addition requirements are pretty unhelpful.

Anyway - I've done the resend, hopefully now meeting the requirements
to avoid further delays.

Jan


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ