[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG48ez1=zOgmdsuE38HkG73EA4en+5QOTLTMZMe+PGcthhwt8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 14:46:32 +0200
From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
To: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, security@...nel.org
Subject: requesting stable backport of BPF security fix (commit dd066823db2ac4e22f721ec85190817b58059a54)
Hi!
Per the policy at Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst, I'm sending
this to netdev@ and davem, rather than stable@; with a CC to security@
because I believe that this is a security process issue.
Upstream commit dd066823db2ac4e22f721ec85190817b58059a54
("bpf/verifier: disallow pointer subtraction") fixes a security bug
(kernel pointer leak to unprivileged userspace). The fix has been in
Linus' tree since about a week ago, but the patch still doesn't appear
in Greg's linux-4.18.y linux-stable-rc repo, in Greg's 4.18
stable-queue, or in davem's stable queue at
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/davem/stable/?state=* .
Please queue it up for backporting.
I am curious: Why was this not queued up for stable immediately? Or
was it, and I looked in the wrong place?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists