netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 23/23] net: WireGuard secure network tunnel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7830522a-968e-0880-beb7-44904466cf14@labo.rs>
Date:   Wed, 26 Sep 2018 18:00:31 +0200
From:   Ivan Labáth <labokml@...o.rs>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 23/23] net: WireGuard secure network tunnel

On 25.09.2018 16:56, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Extensive documentation and description of the protocol and
> considerations, along with formal proofs of the cryptography, are> available at:
> 
>   * https://www.wireguard.com/
>   * https://www.wireguard.com/papers/wireguard.pdf
[]
> +enum { HANDSHAKE_DSCP = 0x88 /* AF41, plus 00 ECN */ };
[]
> +	if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP)) {
> +		len = ntohs(ip_hdr(skb)->tot_len);
> +		if (unlikely(len < sizeof(struct iphdr)))
> +			goto dishonest_packet_size;
> +		if (INET_ECN_is_ce(PACKET_CB(skb)->ds))
> +			IP_ECN_set_ce(ip_hdr(skb));
> +	} else if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) {
> +		len = ntohs(ipv6_hdr(skb)->payload_len) +
> +		      sizeof(struct ipv6hdr);
> +		if (INET_ECN_is_ce(PACKET_CB(skb)->ds))
> +			IP6_ECN_set_ce(skb, ipv6_hdr(skb));
> +	} else
[]
> +	skb_queue_walk (&packets, skb) {
> +		/* 0 for no outer TOS: no leak. TODO: should we use flowi->tos
> +		 * as outer? */
> +		PACKET_CB(skb)->ds = ip_tunnel_ecn_encap(0, ip_hdr(skb), skb);
> +		PACKET_CB(skb)->nonce =
> +				atomic64_inc_return(&key->counter.counter) - 1;
> +		if (unlikely(PACKET_CB(skb)->nonce >= REJECT_AFTER_MESSAGES))
> +			goto out_invalid;
> +	}
Hi,

is there documentation and/or rationale for ecn handling?
Quick search for ecn and dscp didn't reveal any.

Regards,
Ivan