[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180927232659.14348-5-joe@wand.net.nz>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:26:51 -0700
From: Joe Stringer <joe@...d.net.nz>
To: daniel@...earbox.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com,
tgraf@...g.ch, kafai@...com, nitin.hande@...il.com,
mauricio.vasquez@...ito.it
Subject: [PATCHv3 bpf-next 04/12] bpf: Add PTR_TO_SOCKET verifier type
Teach the verifier a little bit about a new type of pointer, a
PTR_TO_SOCKET. This pointer type is accessed from BPF through the
'struct bpf_sock' structure.
Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joe@...d.net.nz>
---
v2: Reuse reg_type_mismatch() in more places
Reduce the number of passes at convert_ctx_access()
v3: Fix build with !CONFIG_NET
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 34 ++++++++++
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 2 +
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
net/core/filter.c | 30 +++++----
4 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 018299a595c8..027697b6a22f 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ enum bpf_arg_type {
ARG_PTR_TO_CTX, /* pointer to context */
ARG_ANYTHING, /* any (initialized) argument is ok */
+ ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET, /* pointer to bpf_sock */
};
/* type of values returned from helper functions */
@@ -162,6 +163,7 @@ enum bpf_return_type {
RET_VOID, /* function doesn't return anything */
RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, /* returns a pointer to map elem value */
RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL, /* returns a pointer to map elem value or NULL */
+ RET_PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL, /* returns a pointer to a socket or NULL */
};
/* eBPF function prototype used by verifier to allow BPF_CALLs from eBPF programs
@@ -213,6 +215,8 @@ enum bpf_reg_type {
PTR_TO_PACKET, /* reg points to skb->data */
PTR_TO_PACKET_END, /* skb->data + headlen */
PTR_TO_FLOW_KEYS, /* reg points to bpf_flow_keys */
+ PTR_TO_SOCKET, /* reg points to struct bpf_sock */
+ PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL, /* reg points to struct bpf_sock or NULL */
};
/* The information passed from prog-specific *_is_valid_access
@@ -343,6 +347,11 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto *bpf_get_trace_printk_proto(void);
typedef unsigned long (*bpf_ctx_copy_t)(void *dst, const void *src,
unsigned long off, unsigned long len);
+typedef u32 (*bpf_convert_ctx_access_t)(enum bpf_access_type type,
+ const struct bpf_insn *src,
+ struct bpf_insn *dst,
+ struct bpf_prog *prog,
+ u32 *target_size);
u64 bpf_event_output(struct bpf_map *map, u64 flags, void *meta, u64 meta_size,
void *ctx, u64 ctx_size, bpf_ctx_copy_t ctx_copy);
@@ -836,4 +845,29 @@ extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_local_storage_proto;
void bpf_user_rnd_init_once(void);
u64 bpf_user_rnd_u32(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5);
+#if defined(CONFIG_NET)
+bool bpf_sock_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
+ struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info);
+u32 bpf_sock_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
+ const struct bpf_insn *si,
+ struct bpf_insn *insn_buf,
+ struct bpf_prog *prog,
+ u32 *target_size);
+#else
+static inline bool bpf_sock_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
+ enum bpf_access_type type,
+ struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+static inline u32 bpf_sock_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
+ const struct bpf_insn *si,
+ struct bpf_insn *insn_buf,
+ struct bpf_prog *prog,
+ u32 *target_size)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
#endif /* _LINUX_BPF_H */
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index af262b97f586..23a2b17bfd75 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ struct bpf_reg_state {
* offset, so they can share range knowledge.
* For PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL this is used to share which map value we
* came from, when one is tested for != NULL.
+ * For PTR_TO_SOCKET this is used to share which pointers retain the
+ * same reference to the socket, to determine proper reference freeing.
*/
u32 id;
/* For scalar types (SCALAR_VALUE), this represents our knowledge of
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index bbb0a812ee81..d4abbf0d5727 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -80,8 +80,8 @@ static const struct bpf_verifier_ops * const bpf_verifier_ops[] = {
* (like pointer plus pointer becomes SCALAR_VALUE type)
*
* When verifier sees load or store instructions the type of base register
- * can be: PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, PTR_TO_CTX, PTR_TO_STACK. These are three pointer
- * types recognized by check_mem_access() function.
+ * can be: PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, PTR_TO_CTX, PTR_TO_STACK, PTR_TO_SOCKET. These are
+ * four pointer types recognized by check_mem_access() function.
*
* PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE means that this register is pointing to 'map element value'
* and the range of [ptr, ptr + map's value_size) is accessible.
@@ -267,6 +267,8 @@ static const char * const reg_type_str[] = {
[PTR_TO_PACKET_META] = "pkt_meta",
[PTR_TO_PACKET_END] = "pkt_end",
[PTR_TO_FLOW_KEYS] = "flow_keys",
+ [PTR_TO_SOCKET] = "sock",
+ [PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL] = "sock_or_null",
};
static char slot_type_char[] = {
@@ -973,6 +975,8 @@ static bool is_spillable_regtype(enum bpf_reg_type type)
case PTR_TO_PACKET_END:
case PTR_TO_FLOW_KEYS:
case CONST_PTR_TO_MAP:
+ case PTR_TO_SOCKET:
+ case PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL:
return true;
default:
return false;
@@ -1341,6 +1345,28 @@ static int check_flow_keys_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int off,
return 0;
}
+static int check_sock_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
+ int size, enum bpf_access_type t)
+{
+ struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env);
+ struct bpf_reg_state *reg = ®s[regno];
+ struct bpf_insn_access_aux info;
+
+ if (reg->smin_value < 0) {
+ verbose(env, "R%d min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.\n",
+ regno);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+
+ if (!bpf_sock_is_valid_access(off, size, t, &info)) {
+ verbose(env, "invalid bpf_sock access off=%d size=%d\n",
+ off, size);
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static bool __is_pointer_value(bool allow_ptr_leaks,
const struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
{
@@ -1459,6 +1485,9 @@ static int check_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
*/
strict = true;
break;
+ case PTR_TO_SOCKET:
+ pointer_desc = "sock ";
+ break;
default:
break;
}
@@ -1726,6 +1755,14 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn
err = check_flow_keys_access(env, off, size);
if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0)
mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno);
+ } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_SOCKET) {
+ if (t == BPF_WRITE) {
+ verbose(env, "cannot write into socket\n");
+ return -EACCES;
+ }
+ err = check_sock_access(env, regno, off, size, t);
+ if (!err && value_regno >= 0)
+ mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno);
} else {
verbose(env, "R%d invalid mem access '%s'\n", regno,
reg_type_str[reg->type]);
@@ -1949,6 +1986,10 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
err = check_ctx_reg(env, reg, regno);
if (err < 0)
return err;
+ } else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET) {
+ expected_type = PTR_TO_SOCKET;
+ if (type != expected_type)
+ goto err_type;
} else if (arg_type_is_mem_ptr(arg_type)) {
expected_type = PTR_TO_STACK;
/* One exception here. In case function allows for NULL to be
@@ -2544,6 +2585,10 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn
}
regs[BPF_REG_0].map_ptr = meta.map_ptr;
regs[BPF_REG_0].id = ++env->id_gen;
+ } else if (fn->ret_type == RET_PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL) {
+ mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_0);
+ regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL;
+ regs[BPF_REG_0].id = ++env->id_gen;
} else {
verbose(env, "unknown return type %d of func %s#%d\n",
fn->ret_type, func_id_name(func_id), func_id);
@@ -2681,6 +2726,8 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return -EACCES;
case CONST_PTR_TO_MAP:
case PTR_TO_PACKET_END:
+ case PTR_TO_SOCKET:
+ case PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL:
verbose(env, "R%d pointer arithmetic on %s prohibited\n",
dst, reg_type_str[ptr_reg->type]);
return -EACCES;
@@ -3628,6 +3675,8 @@ static void mark_ptr_or_null_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, u32 id,
} else {
reg->type = PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE;
}
+ } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL) {
+ reg->type = PTR_TO_SOCKET;
}
/* We don't need id from this point onwards anymore, thus we
* should better reset it, so that state pruning has chances
@@ -4403,6 +4452,8 @@ static bool regsafe(struct bpf_reg_state *rold, struct bpf_reg_state *rcur,
case CONST_PTR_TO_MAP:
case PTR_TO_PACKET_END:
case PTR_TO_FLOW_KEYS:
+ case PTR_TO_SOCKET:
+ case PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL:
/* Only valid matches are exact, which memcmp() above
* would have accepted
*/
@@ -4680,6 +4731,37 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx)
return 0;
}
+/* Return true if it's OK to have the same insn return a different type. */
+static bool reg_type_mismatch_ok(enum bpf_reg_type type)
+{
+ switch (type) {
+ case PTR_TO_CTX:
+ case PTR_TO_SOCKET:
+ case PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL:
+ return false;
+ default:
+ return true;
+ }
+}
+
+/* If an instruction was previously used with particular pointer types, then we
+ * need to be careful to avoid cases such as the below, where it may be ok
+ * for one branch accessing the pointer, but not ok for the other branch:
+ *
+ * R1 = sock_ptr
+ * goto X;
+ * ...
+ * R1 = some_other_valid_ptr;
+ * goto X;
+ * ...
+ * R2 = *(u32 *)(R1 + 0);
+ */
+static bool reg_type_mismatch(enum bpf_reg_type src, enum bpf_reg_type prev)
+{
+ return src != prev && (!reg_type_mismatch_ok(src) ||
+ !reg_type_mismatch_ok(prev));
+}
+
static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
{
struct bpf_verifier_state *state;
@@ -4812,9 +4894,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
*/
*prev_src_type = src_reg_type;
- } else if (src_reg_type != *prev_src_type &&
- (src_reg_type == PTR_TO_CTX ||
- *prev_src_type == PTR_TO_CTX)) {
+ } else if (reg_type_mismatch(src_reg_type, *prev_src_type)) {
/* ABuser program is trying to use the same insn
* dst_reg = *(u32*) (src_reg + off)
* with different pointer types:
@@ -4859,9 +4939,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
if (*prev_dst_type == NOT_INIT) {
*prev_dst_type = dst_reg_type;
- } else if (dst_reg_type != *prev_dst_type &&
- (dst_reg_type == PTR_TO_CTX ||
- *prev_dst_type == PTR_TO_CTX)) {
+ } else if (reg_type_mismatch(dst_reg_type, *prev_dst_type)) {
verbose(env, "same insn cannot be used with different pointers\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -5287,8 +5365,10 @@ static void sanitize_dead_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
}
}
-/* convert load instructions that access fields of 'struct __sk_buff'
- * into sequence of instructions that access fields of 'struct sk_buff'
+/* convert load instructions that access fields of a context type into a
+ * sequence of instructions that access fields of the underlying structure:
+ * struct __sk_buff -> struct sk_buff
+ * struct bpf_sock_ops -> struct sock
*/
static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
{
@@ -5317,12 +5397,14 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
}
}
- if (!ops->convert_ctx_access || bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(env->prog->aux))
+ if (bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(env->prog->aux))
return 0;
insn = env->prog->insnsi + delta;
for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
+ bpf_convert_ctx_access_t convert_ctx_access;
+
if (insn->code == (BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B) ||
insn->code == (BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_H) ||
insn->code == (BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W) ||
@@ -5364,8 +5446,18 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
continue;
}
- if (env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].ptr_type != PTR_TO_CTX)
+ switch (env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].ptr_type) {
+ case PTR_TO_CTX:
+ if (!ops->convert_ctx_access)
+ continue;
+ convert_ctx_access = ops->convert_ctx_access;
+ break;
+ case PTR_TO_SOCKET:
+ convert_ctx_access = bpf_sock_convert_ctx_access;
+ break;
+ default:
continue;
+ }
ctx_field_size = env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].ctx_field_size;
size = BPF_LDST_BYTES(insn);
@@ -5397,8 +5489,8 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
}
target_size = 0;
- cnt = ops->convert_ctx_access(type, insn, insn_buf, env->prog,
- &target_size);
+ cnt = convert_ctx_access(type, insn, insn_buf, env->prog,
+ &target_size);
if (cnt == 0 || cnt >= ARRAY_SIZE(insn_buf) ||
(ctx_field_size && !target_size)) {
verbose(env, "bpf verifier is misconfigured\n");
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 72db8afb7cb6..057af3dc9f08 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -5394,23 +5394,29 @@ static bool __sock_filter_check_size(int off, int size,
return size == size_default;
}
-static bool sock_filter_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
- enum bpf_access_type type,
- const struct bpf_prog *prog,
- struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
+bool bpf_sock_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
+ struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
{
if (off < 0 || off >= sizeof(struct bpf_sock))
return false;
if (off % size != 0)
return false;
- if (!__sock_filter_check_attach_type(off, type,
- prog->expected_attach_type))
- return false;
if (!__sock_filter_check_size(off, size, info))
return false;
return true;
}
+static bool sock_filter_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
+ enum bpf_access_type type,
+ const struct bpf_prog *prog,
+ struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
+{
+ if (!__sock_filter_check_attach_type(off, type,
+ prog->expected_attach_type))
+ return false;
+ return bpf_sock_is_valid_access(off, size, type, info);
+}
+
static int bpf_unclone_prologue(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf, bool direct_write,
const struct bpf_prog *prog, int drop_verdict)
{
@@ -6122,10 +6128,10 @@ static u32 bpf_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
return insn - insn_buf;
}
-static u32 sock_filter_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
- const struct bpf_insn *si,
- struct bpf_insn *insn_buf,
- struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 *target_size)
+u32 bpf_sock_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
+ const struct bpf_insn *si,
+ struct bpf_insn *insn_buf,
+ struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 *target_size)
{
struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
int off;
@@ -7037,7 +7043,7 @@ const struct bpf_prog_ops lwt_seg6local_prog_ops = {
const struct bpf_verifier_ops cg_sock_verifier_ops = {
.get_func_proto = sock_filter_func_proto,
.is_valid_access = sock_filter_is_valid_access,
- .convert_ctx_access = sock_filter_convert_ctx_access,
+ .convert_ctx_access = bpf_sock_convert_ctx_access,
};
const struct bpf_prog_ops cg_sock_prog_ops = {
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists