netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 23/23] net: WireGuard secure network tunnel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHmME9oO1kYP7e1RMz5xm8-bKBJY4vutQ3NROBqhb_GzOJaVBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Sep 2018 17:04:29 +0200
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 23/23] net: WireGuard secure network tunnel

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 5:01 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> The namespace is more than just about the linker. I see an Opps stack
> trace with wg_ symbols, i know i need to talk to Jason. Without any
> prefix, i have to go digging into the code to find out who i need to
> talk to. This is one reason why often every symbol has the prefix, not
> just the global scope ones.

Good point. I'll see what the wg_ prefixing looks like for all the
static functions too.