lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpUVMszSA4ZyiJJgJAu053DZ3RbU91kBewrMMiWd7E19Lg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:55:52 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bond: take rcu lock in bond_poll_controller

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 9:18 AM Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Callers of bond_for_each_slave_rcu are expected to hold the rcu lock,
> otherwise a trace like below is shown

So why not take rcu read lock in netpoll_send_skb_on_dev() where
RCU is also assumed?

As I said, I can't explain why you didn't trigger the RCU warning in
netpoll_send_skb_on_dev()...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ