netdev - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Add HOWTO Korean translation into BPF and XDP Reference Guide.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 30 Sep 2018 11:12:41 +0900
From:   Chang-an Song <csongxdp@...il.com>
To:     daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, tj@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Add HOWTO Korean translation into BPF and
 XDP Reference Guide.

Hello Daniel, Jon
Thank you very much for review.

>That is a bit of a problem, since Apache v2 is not compatible with GPLv2.
>If the license of the document cannot be changed, I don't think we can
>accept it into the kernel tree.

Thank you for sharing information, Jon.  I will check the rst file format
and the license of the document when I submit document at next time.
If I miss something, Please let me know and I will check the checklist, first.

>Alternative option could also be to integrate it into Cilium's doc given the
>original document is present there as well, so it could link to the Korean
>version from there.

Thank you for sharing about other ways, Daniel.
I will check the information you have provided, and then I am investigating
how to put the Korean version page, and I will proceed as soon as it
is completed.

BR/Leo
2018년 9월 27일 (목) 오전 6:19, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>님이 작성:
>
> On 09/26/2018 09:44 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 18:11:42 +0900
> > Chang-an Song <csongxdp@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >>>  - The original document has a copyright assertion but no associated
> >>>    license.  Do we know what the license is?  I assume it's something
> >>>    that is free and GPL-compatible, but that would be good to know for
> >>>    sure.
> >>
> >> 3. I asked to main author Daniel that apache 2.0 license for this document.
> >
> > That is a bit of a problem, since Apache v2 is not compatible with GPLv2.
> > If the license of the document cannot be changed, I don't think we can
> > accept it into the kernel tree.
>
> Alternative option could also be to integrate it into Cilium's doc given the
> original document is present there as well, so it could link to the Korean
> version from there.