[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181001182526.GA28369@splinter>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 21:25:26 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
bernhard.thaler@...et.at, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David Gstir <david@...ma-star.at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] bridge: remove BR_GROUPFWD_RESTRICTED for arbitrary
forwarding of reserved addresses
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 08:16:22PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Florian,
>
> Am Montag, 1. Oktober 2018, 18:24:25 CEST schrieb Florian Fainelli:
> > If all you are doing is forwarding anything, one thing I experimented
> > with before is the following:
> >
> > # tc qdisc add dev eth1 handle ffff: ingress
> > # tc qdisc add dev eth3 handle ffff: ingress
> > # tc filter add dev eth3 parent ffff: u32 \
> > > match u32 0 0 \
> > > action mirred egress redirect dev eth1
> > # tc filter add dev eth1 parent ffff: u32 \
> > > match u32 0 0 \
> > > action mirred egress redirect dev eth3
> > # ifconfig eth3 promisc
> > # ifconfig eth1 promisc
> >
> > and this works just fine actually, bypassing the bridge layer entirely.
>
> Yeah, mirred is a powerful knife. :-)
>
> In my case it is too low level since I utilize the netfilter functionality of
> the bridge layer.
You can use mirred only for the specific packets you care about and let
the rest continue to the bridge.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists