[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59ef80ab-4f28-5c75-c394-55fcfd9bc8ca@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 21:12:48 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>, ast@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] bpf: allow zero-initialising hash map seed
On 10/01/2018 12:45 PM, Lorenz Bauer wrote:
> This patch set adds a new flag BPF_F_ZERO_SEED, which allows
> forcing the seed used by hash maps to zero. This makes
> it possible to write deterministic tests.
>
> Based on an off-list conversation with Alexei Starovoitov and
> Daniel Borkmann.
>
> Lorenz Bauer (3):
> bpf: allow zero-initializing hash map seed
> tools: sync linux/bpf.h
> tools: add selftest for BPF_F_ZERO_SEED
>
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 +
> kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 8 ++-
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 +
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++----
> 4 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
Please respin with proper SoB for each patch and non-empty commit
description. I think patch 1 should also have a more elaborate
commit description on the use case for BPF_F_ZERO_SEED, and I
think also a better comment in the uapi header that this is only
meant for testing and not production use.
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists