lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAACQVJoGBPJX_kZsJMkgojiLTM7bhP-ddcV2Lp4wi3ptnDEA2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Oct 2018 09:39:12 +0530
From:   Vasundhara Volam <vasundhara-v.volam@...adcom.com>
To:     gerlitz.or@...il.com
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "michael.chan@...adcom.com" <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 4/9] bnxt_en: Use ignore_ari devlink parameter

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 2:53 AM Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 9:30 AM Vasundhara Volam
> <vasundhara-v.volam@...adcom.com> wrote:
> > This patch adds support for ignore_ari generic permanent mode
> > devlink parameter. This parameter is disabled by default. It can be
> > enabled using devlink param commands.
> >
> > ignore_ari - If enabled, device ignores ARI(Alternate Routing ID)
> > capability, even when platforms has the support and creates same number
> > of partitions when platform does not support ARI capability.
>
> why you want to ignore that?
In some Dell platforms, we don't want our adapter to create more number of
functions even when ARI is enabled.
>
>
> >
> > Cc: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vasundhara Volam <vasundhara-v.volam@...adcom.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.c | 6 ++++++
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.h | 2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.c
> > index 790c684..5173881 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.c
> > @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
> >  static const struct bnxt_dl_nvm_param nvm_params[] = {
> >         {DEVLINK_PARAM_GENERIC_ID_ENABLE_SRIOV, NVM_OFF_ENABLE_SRIOV,
> >          BNXT_NVM_SHARED_CFG, 1},
> > +       {DEVLINK_PARAM_GENERIC_ID_IGNORE_ARI, NVM_OFF_IGNORE_ARI,
> > +        BNXT_NVM_SHARED_CFG, 1},
> >  };
> >
> >  static int bnxt_hwrm_nvm_req(struct bnxt *bp, u32 param_id, void *msg,
> > @@ -108,6 +110,10 @@ static int bnxt_dl_nvm_param_set(struct devlink *dl, u32 id,
> >                               BIT(DEVLINK_PARAM_CMODE_PERMANENT),
> >                               bnxt_dl_nvm_param_get, bnxt_dl_nvm_param_set,
> >                               NULL),
> > +       DEVLINK_PARAM_GENERIC(IGNORE_ARI,
> > +                             BIT(DEVLINK_PARAM_CMODE_PERMANENT),
> > +                             bnxt_dl_nvm_param_get, bnxt_dl_nvm_param_set,
> > +                             NULL),
> >  };
> >
> >  int bnxt_dl_register(struct bnxt *bp)
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.h
> > index 2f68dc0..da146492 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.h
> > @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ static inline void bnxt_link_bp_to_dl(struct bnxt *bp, struct devlink *dl)
> >         }
> >  }
> >
> > +#define NVM_OFF_IGNORE_ARI             164
>
> > +#define NVM_OFF_HW_TC_OFFLOAD          170
>
> what is this (on/off for TC offloads?) and how it's related to ARI?
This was a mistake carried, I will remove it in next version. Thanks
>
> >  #define NVM_OFF_ENABLE_SRIOV           401

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ