netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] netfilter: xt_quota: fix the behavior of xt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181002105220.yyof3qxfege5o6ic@salvia>
Date:   Tue, 2 Oct 2018 12:52:20 +0200
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com>
Cc:     Chenbo Feng <chenbofeng.kernel@...il.com>,
        Linux NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>,
        Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netfilter: xt_quota: fix the behavior of
 xt_quota module

On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 12:51:25PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 03:38:24AM -0700, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> > > Well, you will need a kernel + userspace update anyway, right?
> > 
> > It's true you need new iptables userspace to *see* during dump and/or
> > manually *set* during restore the remain counter.
> > 
> > However, (and I believe Chenbo tested this) just a new kernel is
> > enough to fix the problem of modifications within the table resetting
> > the counter.
> > This is because the data gets copied out of kernel and back into
> > kernel by old iptables without any further modifications.
> > ie. the new kernel not clearing the field on copy to userspace and
> > honouring it on copy to kernel is sufficient.
> 
> I see, Willem removed this behaviour in newer kernels. The private
> area is now zeroed, is that what you mean right? So I guess this
> cannot be done transparently.
> 
> Anyway, I think the --remain approach to fix this longstanding
> problem from iptables :-).

Argh, broken sentence: I mean, I think it's the way to go for
iptables.