[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJ7u+kJxWevjahYOufrqEoFaSsOVZnRy6FwnawiMZposw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 18:54:55 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] inet: frags: rework rhashtable dismantle
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 5:58 PM Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> The walk interface was designed to handle read-only iteration
> through the hash table. While this probably works since the
> actual freeing is delayed by RCU, it seems to be rather fragile.
>
> How about using the dead flag but instead of putting it in the
> rhashtable put it in netns_frags and have the timers check on that
> before calling rhashtable_remove?
Sure, I will send a new version, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists