lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9rfd9wFOFNxaC23nAtGtjOUZGOYUwJKHS35iFwT8DYuwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Oct 2018 05:31:36 +0200
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Samuel Neves <sneves@....uc.pt>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 21/23] crypto: port ChaCha20 to Zinc

Hi Herbert,

On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:26 AM Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> Oh nice, so you did the conversion of the existing crypto code.
>
> I presume someone has done the numbers and verified that there
> is no performance regression?
>
> If so it would be good to include those numbers somewhere in this
> submission (within a patch description so that it goes into git).

Indeed I've done a pretty ridiculous amount of benchmarking, and the
x86_64 numbers are included in those commits because they're pretty
straightforward to show. The performance is also better on
arm1176,cortex-a7,8,9,15,53,73. On mips, as well, performance is
better, since there wasn't any optimized code there at all. Early
versions of this patchset included a regression on cortex-a7, which
was particularly problematic because Eric Biggers recent fscrypt work
requires fast chacha on that hardware, but this v6 (and the future v7)
contain code that is faster on all platforms across the board.

Regards,
Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ