netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 00/23] WireGuard: Secure Network Tunnel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu8fr_qADiTJH05nVWF7Yi3U722nfKJsMaRE9CP3YjNBbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Oct 2018 08:04:04 +0200
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 00/23] WireGuard: Secure Network Tunnel

On 2 October 2018 at 05:45, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
> Hi Herbert,
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:39 AM Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>> > I would also strongly prefer that all crypto work is taken through
>> > Herbert's tree, so we have a coherent view of it before it goes
>> > upstream.
>>
>> I agree.  I don't have any problems with the zinc code living in
>> its own git tree.  But any upstream merges should definitely go
>> through the crypto tree because the inherent ties between the two
>> code-base.
>
> I can send you pull requests then if there are development cycles when
> there are in fact relations between the two trees. I'll update the
> commit message describing Zinc to include this.
>

Can you explain why you it is so important to you that your changes
remain outside the crypto tree?

Also, I still think the name Zinc (zinc is not crypto/) is needlessly
divisive and condescending, and unsaying it (in v2 and up) doesn't
really work on the Internet (especially since you are still repeating
it in your conference talk.)