[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181004065720.GE896@E570.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 23:57:20 -0700
From: Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>,
Ulrich Kunitz <kune@...ne-taler.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] wireless: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 12:06:48PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com> writes:
>
> > lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements,
> > since it won't get confused when someone else holds the lock. This is
> > also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>
> > Cc: Ulrich Kunitz <kune@...ne-taler.de>
> > Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> > Cc: <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
> > Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/wireless/zydas/zd1211rw/zd_mac.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Should I take this or is it going through some other tree?
Sure you can take this if you like. If not, Paul McKenney will take it in his
tree.
Thanks,
Lance
> If it goes to via some other tree:
>
> Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
>
> --
> Kalle Valo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists