[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b8409c95-a2e4-1c5f-e6ee-9fcb7a52d45e@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 09:49:42 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, dsahern@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, christian@...uner.io, jbenc@...hat.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 20/20] net/bridge: Update br_mdb_dump for strict
data checking
On 10/5/18 1:34 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 14:33:55 -0700
>
>> @@ -162,6 +162,28 @@ static int br_mdb_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb,
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> +static int br_mdb_valid_dump_req(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> +{
>> + struct br_port_msg *bpm;
>> +
>> + if (nlh->nlmsg_len < nlmsg_msg_size(sizeof(*bpm))) {
>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid header");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + if (bpm->ifindex) {
>
> 'bpm' is never initialized.
>
Thanks.
I had not updated the bridge command for strict checking. Doing so and
bridge mdb show generates a trace. Will fix.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists