netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/8] udp and configurable gro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <736e48946dee45db19c13c9d64f1aa21e0c8ef99.camel@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 05 Oct 2018 15:53:51 +0200
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     steffen.klassert@...unet.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/8] udp and configurable gro

Hi all,

On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 13:59 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> This is a *very rough* draft. Mainly for discussion while we also
> look at another partially overlapping approach [1].

I'm wondering how we go on from this ? I'm fine with either approaches.

Also, I'm interested in [try to] enable GRO/GSO batching in the
forwarding path, as you outlined initially in the GSO series
submission. That should cover Steffen use-case, too, right? 

Cheers,

Paolo