[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a5113f03-7ac8-4be6-3d1c-5ba74639121e@lwfinger.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 15:05:21 -0500
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Tsang-Shian Lin <thlin@...ltek.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: rtl8821ae: add in a missing break in switch
statement
On 10/6/18 2:30 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> writes:
>
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>
>> The switch case RATR_INX_WIRELESS_MC has a missing break, this seems
>> to be unintentional as the setting of variable ret gets overwritten
>> when the case falls through to the following RATR_INX_WIRELESS_AC_5N
>> case. Fix this by adding in the missing break.
>>
>> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1167237 ("Missing break in switch")
>>
>> Fixes: 3c05bedb5fef ("Staging: rtl8812ae: Add Realtek 8821 PCI WIFI driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/hw.c | 1 +
>
> Is the fixes line correct? This patch is not for staging.
No, the correct fixes commit is 21e4b0726dc67 (" rtlwifi: rtl8821ae: Move driver
from staging to regular tree").
This driver was initially placed in staging as it was needed for a special
project, which is the commit that Colin used. As the patch subject states, the
driver was later moved to the regular wireless tree.
That break is required, thus ACKed-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
thanks,
Larry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists