[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee87bdce-b840-80eb-e904-bcb86ea60ec2@aquantia.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 17:07:09 +0300
From: Igor Russkikh <igor.russkikh@...antia.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Bezrukov <Dmitry.Bezrukov@...antia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/19] net: usb: aqc111: Introduce PHY access
Hi Andrew,
>>>> + struct aqc111_data *aqc111_data = (struct aqc111_data *)dev->data[0];
>>>
>>> Having to do this cast all the time is quiet ugly. It seems like some
>>> other usb_net drivers use netdev_priv().
>>
>> As I see most of usb usbnet based devices use the same theme with accessing
>> private data via dev->data.
>
> It is just ugly. It would of been better if dev->data[] was a void
> pointer. This is the first usbnet driver i've reviewed, so i don't
> know the history behind this. I wonder if adding a void *priv would be
> accepted?
I can't comment on history of this, but...
net-next/drivers/net/usb$ grep "dev->data" * | wc -l
173
Regards,
Igor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists