netdev - Re: [PATCH] bpf: fix building without CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 8 Oct 2018 11:24:25 -0700
From:   Joe Stringer <joe@...d.net.nz>
To:     daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:     liu.song.a23@...il.com, arnd@...db.de, ast@...nel.org,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp, brakmo@...com, rdna@...com,
        Jesper Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, m.xhonneux@...il.com,
        dsahern@...il.com, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: fix building without CONFIG_INET

On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 at 01:41, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
>
> On 10/05/2018 09:07 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > On 10/05/2018 09:02 PM, Song Liu wrote:
> > [...]
> >> BPF_CALL_x() has static already (before this patch). We should not
> >> need change that
> >> for all the BPF_CALL_?(). Joe's version looks better to me.
> >
> > My preference as well, thanks!
>
> ping, can someone send an updated patch?

I will send a fresh version shortly.