[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181008230125.2330-14-pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 01:01:07 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 13/31] netfilter: nat: remove unnecessary rcu_read_lock in nf_nat_redirect_ipv{4/6}
From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
nf_nat_redirect_ipv4() and nf_nat_redirect_ipv6() are only called by
netfilter hook point. so that rcu_read_lock and rcu_read_unlock() are
unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_nat_redirect.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_redirect.c b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_redirect.c
index adee04af8d43..78a9e6454ff3 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_redirect.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_redirect.c
@@ -52,13 +52,11 @@ nf_nat_redirect_ipv4(struct sk_buff *skb,
newdst = 0;
- rcu_read_lock();
indev = __in_dev_get_rcu(skb->dev);
if (indev && indev->ifa_list) {
ifa = indev->ifa_list;
newdst = ifa->ifa_local;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
if (!newdst)
return NF_DROP;
@@ -97,7 +95,6 @@ nf_nat_redirect_ipv6(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nf_nat_range2 *range,
struct inet6_ifaddr *ifa;
bool addr = false;
- rcu_read_lock();
idev = __in6_dev_get(skb->dev);
if (idev != NULL) {
read_lock_bh(&idev->lock);
@@ -108,7 +105,6 @@ nf_nat_redirect_ipv6(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nf_nat_range2 *range,
}
read_unlock_bh(&idev->lock);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
if (!addr)
return NF_DROP;
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists