netdev - [PATCH v2 net-next 10/23] rtnetlink: Update rtnl_bridge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun,  7 Oct 2018 20:16:31 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     christian@...uner.io, jbenc@...hat.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 10/23] rtnetlink: Update rtnl_bridge_getlink for strict data checking

From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>

Update rtnl_bridge_getlink for strict data checking. If the flag is set,
the dump request is expected to have an ifinfomsg struct as the header
potentially followed by one or more attributes. Any data passed in the
header or as an attribute is taken as a request to influence the data
returned. Only values supported by the dump handler are allowed to be
non-0 or set in the request. At the moment only the IFLA_EXT_MASK
attribute is supported.

Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
---
 net/core/rtnetlink.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index 12fd52105005..e38e1f178611 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -4021,28 +4021,72 @@ int ndo_dflt_bridge_getlink(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 pid, u32 seq,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ndo_dflt_bridge_getlink);
 
+static int valid_bridge_getlink_req(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
+				    bool strict_check, u32 *filter_mask,
+				    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+	struct nlattr *tb[IFLA_MAX+1];
+	int err, i;
+
+	if (strict_check) {
+		struct ifinfomsg *ifm;
+
+		if (nlh->nlmsg_len < nlmsg_msg_size(sizeof(*ifm))) {
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid header for bridge link dump");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		ifm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
+		if (ifm->__ifi_pad || ifm->ifi_type || ifm->ifi_flags ||
+		    ifm->ifi_change || ifm->ifi_index) {
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid values in header for bridge link dump request");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		err = nlmsg_parse_strict(nlh, sizeof(struct ifinfomsg), tb,
+					 IFLA_MAX, ifla_policy, extack);
+	} else {
+		err = nlmsg_parse(nlh, sizeof(struct ifinfomsg), tb,
+				  IFLA_MAX, ifla_policy, extack);
+	}
+	if (err < 0)
+		return err;
+
+	/* new attributes should only be added with strict checking */
+	for (i = 0; i <= IFLA_MAX; ++i) {
+		if (!tb[i])
+			continue;
+
+		switch (i) {
+		case IFLA_EXT_MASK:
+			*filter_mask = nla_get_u32(tb[i]);
+			break;
+		default:
+			if (strict_check) {
+				NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Unsupported attribute in bridge link dump request");
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int rtnl_bridge_getlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 {
+	const struct nlmsghdr *nlh = cb->nlh;
 	struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
 	struct net_device *dev;
 	int idx = 0;
 	u32 portid = NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid;
-	u32 seq = cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq;
+	u32 seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
 	u32 filter_mask = 0;
 	int err;
 
-	if (nlmsg_len(cb->nlh) > sizeof(struct ifinfomsg)) {
-		struct nlattr *extfilt;
-
-		extfilt = nlmsg_find_attr(cb->nlh, sizeof(struct ifinfomsg),
-					  IFLA_EXT_MASK);
-		if (extfilt) {
-			if (nla_len(extfilt) < sizeof(filter_mask))
-				return -EINVAL;
-
-			filter_mask = nla_get_u32(extfilt);
-		}
-	}
+	err = valid_bridge_getlink_req(nlh, cb->strict_check, &filter_mask,
+				       cb->extack);
+	if (err < 0 && cb->strict_check)
+		return err;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	for_each_netdev_rcu(net, dev) {
-- 
2.11.0