netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 12/20] rtnetlink: Update ipmr_rtm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <69539a4e-be1e-5222-a022-771783acd100@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 7 Oct 2018 19:32:49 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, jbenc@...hat.com,
        stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 12/20] rtnetlink: Update ipmr_rtm_dumplink for
 strict data checking

On 10/7/18 4:40 AM, Christian Brauner wrote:
>> @@ -2718,6 +2743,13 @@ static int ipmr_rtm_dumplink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
>>  	unsigned int e = 0, s_e;
>>  	struct mr_table *mrt;
>>  
>> +	if (cb->strict_check) {
>> +		int err = ipmr_valid_dumplink(cb->nlh, cb->extack);
>> +
>> +		if (err)
>> +			return err;
> 
> Nit: can we remove the unnecessary \n, please.

Coding standards dictate a newline between declarations and code. And
that is my preference too.