[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a06a6fbf-7591-747d-2f27-9a11bf830331@aquantia.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 09:09:54 +0000
From: Igor Russkikh <Igor.Russkikh@...antia.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Bezrukov <Dmitry.Bezrukov@...antia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/19] net: usb: aqc111: Introduce PHY access
Hi Andrew,
>>
>> + struct aqc111_data *aqc111_data = (struct aqc111_data *)dev->data[0];
>
> Having to do this cast all the time is quiet ugly. It seems like some
> other usb_net drivers use netdev_priv().
As I see most of usb usbnet based devices use the same theme with accessing
private data via dev->data.
netdev_priv() is used to store struct usbnet itself.
>> + u8 dpa; /*direct PHY access*/
>> + struct aqc111_phy_options phy_ops;
>> +} __packed;
>
> Why pack this? Do you send it to the firmware?
Agreed, no. We have to pack phy_ops and wol_config only.
Regards,
Igor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists