| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20181009224924.30151-20-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 15:49:14 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
sthemmin@...rosoft.com, Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Subject: [PATCH stable 4.9 19/29] ip: discard IPv4 datagrams with overlapping segments.
From: Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>
This behavior is required in IPv6, and there is little need
to tolerate overlapping fragments in IPv4. This change
simplifies the code and eliminates potential DDoS attack vectors.
Tested: ran ip_defrag selftest (not yet available uptream).
Suggested-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
(cherry picked from commit 7969e5c40dfd04799d4341f1b7cd266b6e47f227)
---
include/uapi/linux/snmp.h | 1 +
net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c | 75 ++++++++++-----------------------------
net/ipv4/proc.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h b/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h
index e7a31f830690..3442a26d36d9 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ enum
IPSTATS_MIB_ECT1PKTS, /* InECT1Pkts */
IPSTATS_MIB_ECT0PKTS, /* InECT0Pkts */
IPSTATS_MIB_CEPKTS, /* InCEPkts */
+ IPSTATS_MIB_REASM_OVERLAPS, /* ReasmOverlaps */
__IPSTATS_MIB_MAX
};
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
index 73c0adc61a65..8bfb34e9ea32 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
@@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ static int ip_frag_reinit(struct ipq *qp)
/* Add new segment to existing queue. */
static int ip_frag_queue(struct ipq *qp, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
+ struct net *net = container_of(qp->q.net, struct net, ipv4.frags);
struct sk_buff *prev, *next;
struct net_device *dev;
unsigned int fragsize;
@@ -355,65 +356,23 @@ static int ip_frag_queue(struct ipq *qp, struct sk_buff *skb)
}
found:
- /* We found where to put this one. Check for overlap with
- * preceding fragment, and, if needed, align things so that
- * any overlaps are eliminated.
+ /* RFC5722, Section 4, amended by Errata ID : 3089
+ * When reassembling an IPv6 datagram, if
+ * one or more its constituent fragments is determined to be an
+ * overlapping fragment, the entire datagram (and any constituent
+ * fragments) MUST be silently discarded.
+ *
+ * We do the same here for IPv4.
*/
- if (prev) {
- int i = (prev->ip_defrag_offset + prev->len) - offset;
- if (i > 0) {
- offset += i;
- err = -EINVAL;
- if (end <= offset)
- goto err;
- err = -ENOMEM;
- if (!pskb_pull(skb, i))
- goto err;
- if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY)
- skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
- }
- }
+ /* Is there an overlap with the previous fragment? */
+ if (prev &&
+ (prev->ip_defrag_offset + prev->len) > offset)
+ goto discard_qp;
- err = -ENOMEM;
-
- while (next && next->ip_defrag_offset < end) {
- int i = end - next->ip_defrag_offset; /* overlap is 'i' bytes */
-
- if (i < next->len) {
- int delta = -next->truesize;
-
- /* Eat head of the next overlapped fragment
- * and leave the loop. The next ones cannot overlap.
- */
- if (!pskb_pull(next, i))
- goto err;
- delta += next->truesize;
- if (delta)
- add_frag_mem_limit(qp->q.net, delta);
- next->ip_defrag_offset += i;
- qp->q.meat -= i;
- if (next->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY)
- next->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
- break;
- } else {
- struct sk_buff *free_it = next;
-
- /* Old fragment is completely overridden with
- * new one drop it.
- */
- next = next->next;
-
- if (prev)
- prev->next = next;
- else
- qp->q.fragments = next;
-
- qp->q.meat -= free_it->len;
- sub_frag_mem_limit(qp->q.net, free_it->truesize);
- kfree_skb(free_it);
- }
- }
+ /* Is there an overlap with the next fragment? */
+ if (next && next->ip_defrag_offset < end)
+ goto discard_qp;
/* Note : skb->ip_defrag_offset and skb->dev share the same location */
dev = skb->dev;
@@ -461,6 +420,10 @@ static int ip_frag_queue(struct ipq *qp, struct sk_buff *skb)
skb_dst_drop(skb);
return -EINPROGRESS;
+discard_qp:
+ inet_frag_kill(&qp->q);
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ __IP_INC_STATS(net, IPSTATS_MIB_REASM_OVERLAPS);
err:
kfree_skb(skb);
return err;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/proc.c b/net/ipv4/proc.c
index aa1e52587bf5..ec48d8eafc7e 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/proc.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/proc.c
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ static const struct snmp_mib snmp4_ipextstats_list[] = {
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("InECT1Pkts", IPSTATS_MIB_ECT1PKTS),
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("InECT0Pkts", IPSTATS_MIB_ECT0PKTS),
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("InCEPkts", IPSTATS_MIB_CEPKTS),
+ SNMP_MIB_ITEM("ReasmOverlaps", IPSTATS_MIB_REASM_OVERLAPS),
SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL
};
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists