[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a21m8Uw6JkjU2-eG9p4yzcpiqgR5PcFeATX9+SbUMqGSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 14:00:04 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Sunil Kovvuri <sunil.kovvuri@...il.com>
Cc: Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
gakula@...vell.com, sgoutham@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/15] octeontx2-af: Reconfig MSIX base with IOVA
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 11:20 AM Sunil Kovvuri <sunil.kovvuri@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 1:27 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 9:03 AM Sunil Kovvuri <sunil.kovvuri@...il.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 5:38 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 5:01 PM <sunil.kovvuri@...il.com> wrote:
> > I think if you enable CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL, the virt_to_page()
> > above should trigger a warning in
> >
> > phys_addr_t __virt_to_phys(unsigned long x)
> > {
> > WARN(!__is_lm_address(x),
> > "virt_to_phys used for non-linear address: %pK (%pS)\n",
> > (void *)x,
> > (void *)x);
> >
> > return __virt_to_phys_nodebug(x);
> > }
> >
> > Can you verify that?
> >
> > Arnd
>
> No, it isn't, as for 64bit systems CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP is enabled.
But that is also user-selectable, right? It still seems to be really
fragile to rely on non-documented behavior of virt_to_phys()
here, if that only works for some configurations.
> But is there any alternative to what is being done ?
I'm not completely sure, but there may be a way to do this correctly
using the iommu API instead of the dma-mapping API. What you do
here is fairly rare, but not unprecedented.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists