lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:55:13 +0000
From:   Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        "parthasarathy.bhuvaragan@...csson.com" 
        <parthasarathy.bhuvaragan@...csson.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
        <tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan <parthasarathy.bhuvaragan@...il.com>
Subject: RE: net/tipc: recursive locking in tipc_link_reset

Hi Dmitry,
Yes, we are aware of this, the kernel test robot warned us about this a few days ago.
I am looking into it.

///jon

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> Sent: October 11, 2018 3:55 AM
> To: parthasarathy.bhuvaragan@...csson.com; Jon Maloy
> <jon.maloy@...csson.com>; David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Ying Xue
> <ying.xue@...driver.com>; netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>; tipc-
> discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net; LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: net/tipc: recursive locking in tipc_link_reset
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am getting the following error while booting the latest kernel on
> bb2d8f2f61047cbde08b78ec03e4ebdb01ee5434 (Oct 10). Config is attached.
> 
> Since this happens during boot, this makes LOCKDEP completely unusable,
> does not allow to discover any other locking issues and masks all new bugs
> being introduced into kernel.
> Please fix asap.
> Thanks
> 
> 
> WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 4.19.0-rc7+ #14 Not tainted
> --------------------------------------------
> swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock:
> 00000000dcfc0fc8 (&(&list->lock)->rlock#4){+...}, at: spin_lock_bh
> include/linux/spinlock.h:334 [inline]
> 00000000dcfc0fc8 (&(&list->lock)->rlock#4){+...}, at:
> tipc_link_reset+0x125/0xdf0 net/tipc/link.c:850
> 
> but task is already holding lock:
> 00000000cbb9b036 (&(&list->lock)->rlock#4){+...}, at: spin_lock_bh
> include/linux/spinlock.h:334 [inline]
> 00000000cbb9b036 (&(&list->lock)->rlock#4){+...}, at:
> tipc_link_reset+0xfa/0xdf0 net/tipc/link.c:849
> 
> other info that might help us debug this:
>  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> 
>        CPU0
>        ----
>   lock(&(&list->lock)->rlock#4);
>   lock(&(&list->lock)->rlock#4);
> 
>  *** DEADLOCK ***
> 
>  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
> 
> 2 locks held by swapper/0/1:
>  #0: 00000000f7539d34 (pernet_ops_rwsem){+.+.}, at:
> register_pernet_subsys+0x19/0x40 net/core/net_namespace.c:1051
>  #1: 00000000cbb9b036 (&(&list->lock)->rlock#4){+...}, at:
> spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:334 [inline]
>  #1: 00000000cbb9b036 (&(&list->lock)->rlock#4){+...}, at:
> tipc_link_reset+0xfa/0xdf0 net/tipc/link.c:849
> 
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.19.0-rc7+ #14 Hardware name:
> QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace:
>  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
>  dump_stack+0x1af/0x295 lib/dump_stack.c:113  print_deadlock_bug
> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1759 [inline]  check_deadlock
> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1803 [inline]  validate_chain
> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2399 [inline]
>  __lock_acquire+0xf1e/0x3c60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3411
>  lock_acquire+0x1db/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3900
> __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:135 [inline]
>  _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x31/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:168  spin_lock_bh
> include/linux/spinlock.h:334 [inline]
>  tipc_link_reset+0x125/0xdf0 net/tipc/link.c:850
>  tipc_link_bc_create+0xb5/0x1f0 net/tipc/link.c:526
>  tipc_bcast_init+0x59b/0xab0 net/tipc/bcast.c:521
>  tipc_init_net+0x472/0x610 net/tipc/core.c:82
>  ops_init+0xf7/0x520 net/core/net_namespace.c:129
> __register_pernet_operations net/core/net_namespace.c:940 [inline]
>  register_pernet_operations+0x453/0xac0 net/core/net_namespace.c:1011
>  register_pernet_subsys+0x28/0x40 net/core/net_namespace.c:1052
>  tipc_init+0x83/0x104 net/tipc/core.c:140  do_one_initcall+0x109/0x70a
> init/main.c:885  do_initcall_level init/main.c:953 [inline]  do_initcalls
> init/main.c:961 [inline]  do_basic_setup init/main.c:979 [inline]
> kernel_init_freeable+0x4bd/0x57f init/main.c:1144
>  kernel_init+0x13/0x180 init/main.c:1063
>  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:413

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ