lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5BC3F0D4.60409@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:43:48 +0800
From:   jiangyiwen <jiangyiwen@...wei.com>
To:     <stefanha@...hat.com>
CC:     <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] VSOCK: The performance problem of vhost_vsock.

Hi Stefan & All:

Now I find vhost-vsock has two performance problems even if it
is not designed for performance.

First, I think vhost-vsock should faster than vhost-net because it
is no TCP/IP stack, but the real test result vhost-net is 5~10
times than vhost-vsock, currently I am looking for the reason.

Second, vhost-vsock only supports two vqs(tx and rx), that means
if multiple sockets in the guest will use the same vq to transmit
the message and get the response. So if there are multiple applications
in the guest, we should support "Multiqueue" feature for Virtio-vsock.

Stefan, have you encountered these problems?

Thanks,
Yiwen.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ