netdev - [PATCH net 3/3] nfp: flower: use offsets provided by pedit instead of index for ipv6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181015235225.17574-4-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Oct 2018 16:52:25 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
        Pieter Jansen van Vuuren 
        <pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 3/3] nfp: flower: use offsets provided by pedit instead of index for ipv6

From: Pieter Jansen van Vuuren <pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com>

Previously when populating the set ipv6 address action, we incorrectly
made use of pedit's key index to determine which 32bit word should be
set. We now calculate which word has been selected based on the offset
provided by the pedit action.

Fixes: 354b82bb320e ("nfp: add set ipv6 source and destination address")
Signed-off-by: Pieter Jansen van Vuuren <pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
---
 .../ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/action.c    | 26 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/action.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/action.c
index c39d7fdf73e6..7a1e9cd9cc62 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/action.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/action.c
@@ -450,12 +450,12 @@ nfp_fl_set_ip4(const struct tc_action *action, int idx, u32 off,
 }
 
 static void
-nfp_fl_set_ip6_helper(int opcode_tag, int idx, __be32 exact, __be32 mask,
+nfp_fl_set_ip6_helper(int opcode_tag, u8 word, __be32 exact, __be32 mask,
 		      struct nfp_fl_set_ipv6_addr *ip6)
 {
-	ip6->ipv6[idx % 4].mask |= mask;
-	ip6->ipv6[idx % 4].exact &= ~mask;
-	ip6->ipv6[idx % 4].exact |= exact & mask;
+	ip6->ipv6[word].mask |= mask;
+	ip6->ipv6[word].exact &= ~mask;
+	ip6->ipv6[word].exact |= exact & mask;
 
 	ip6->reserved = cpu_to_be16(0);
 	ip6->head.jump_id = opcode_tag;
@@ -468,6 +468,7 @@ nfp_fl_set_ip6(const struct tc_action *action, int idx, u32 off,
 	       struct nfp_fl_set_ipv6_addr *ip_src)
 {
 	__be32 exact, mask;
+	u8 word;
 
 	/* We are expecting tcf_pedit to return a big endian value */
 	mask = (__force __be32)~tcf_pedit_mask(action, idx);
@@ -476,17 +477,20 @@ nfp_fl_set_ip6(const struct tc_action *action, int idx, u32 off,
 	if (exact & ~mask)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	if (off < offsetof(struct ipv6hdr, saddr))
+	if (off < offsetof(struct ipv6hdr, saddr)) {
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-	else if (off < offsetof(struct ipv6hdr, daddr))
-		nfp_fl_set_ip6_helper(NFP_FL_ACTION_OPCODE_SET_IPV6_SRC, idx,
+	} else if (off < offsetof(struct ipv6hdr, daddr)) {
+		word = (off - offsetof(struct ipv6hdr, saddr)) / sizeof(exact);
+		nfp_fl_set_ip6_helper(NFP_FL_ACTION_OPCODE_SET_IPV6_SRC, word,
 				      exact, mask, ip_src);
-	else if (off < offsetof(struct ipv6hdr, daddr) +
-		       sizeof(struct in6_addr))
-		nfp_fl_set_ip6_helper(NFP_FL_ACTION_OPCODE_SET_IPV6_DST, idx,
+	} else if (off < offsetof(struct ipv6hdr, daddr) +
+		       sizeof(struct in6_addr)) {
+		word = (off - offsetof(struct ipv6hdr, daddr)) / sizeof(exact);
+		nfp_fl_set_ip6_helper(NFP_FL_ACTION_OPCODE_SET_IPV6_DST, word,
 				      exact, mask, ip_dst);
-	else
+	} else {
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.17.1