[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181016151708.3fff9bd9@xeon-e3>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:17:08 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] r8169: fix NAPI handling under high load
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 22:37:31 +0200
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> wrote:
> rtl_rx() and rtl_tx() are called only if the respective bits are set
> in the interrupt status register. Under high load NAPI may not be
> able to process all data (work_done == budget) and it will schedule
> subsequent calls to the poll callback.
> rtl_ack_events() however resets the bits in the interrupt status
> register, therefore subsequent calls to rtl8169_poll() won't call
> rtl_rx() and rtl_tx() - chip interrupts are still disabled.
>
> Fix this by calling rtl_rx() and rtl_tx() independent of the bits
> set in the interrupt status register. Both functions will detect
> if there's nothing to do for them.
>
> This issue has been there more or less forever (at least it exists in
> 3.16 already), so I can't provide a "Fixes" tag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Another issue is this:
if (work_done < budget) {
napi_complete_done(napi, work_done);
rtl_irq_enable(tp, enable_mask);
mmiowb();
}
return work_done;
}
The code needs to check return value of napi_complete_done.
if (work_done < budget &&
napi_complete_done(napi, work_done) {
rtl_irq_enable(tp, enable_mask);
mmiowb();
}
return work_done;
}
Try that, it might fix the problem and your logic would
be unnecessary
Powered by blists - more mailing lists