[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181015.225802.2144503105449136099.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 22:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: edumazet@...gle.com
Cc: ncardwell@...gle.com, ycheng@...gle.com, soheil@...gle.com,
zelo.zejn@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] tcp: second round for EDT conversion
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:37:51 -0700
> First round of EDT patches left TCP stack in a non optimal state.
>
> - High speed flows suffered from loss of performance, addressed
> by the first patch of this series.
>
> - Second patch brings pacing to the current state of networking,
> since we now reach ~100 Gbit on a single TCP flow.
>
> - Third patch implements a mitigation for scheduling delays,
> like the one we did in sch_fq in the past.
>
> - Fourth patch removes one special case in sch_fq for ACK packets.
>
> - Fifth patch removes a serious perfomance cost for TCP internal
> pacing. We should setup the high resolution timer only if
> really needed.
>
> - Sixth patch fixes a typo in BBR.
>
> - Last patch is one minor change in cdg congestion control.
>
> Neal Cardwell also has a patch series fixing BBR after
> EDT adoption.
Series applied, thanks Eric.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists