netdev - Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: add local_bh_disable() around u64_stats_update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 Oct 2018 18:26:05 +0900
From:   Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: add local_bh_disable() around
 u64_stats_update_begin

On 2018/10/18 18:11, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2018-10-18 18:06:57 [+0900], Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>> NACK. Again, this race should not happen because of NAPI guard.
>> We need to investigate why this warning happened.
> 
> I tried to explain this. Please see
> 	20181018090812.rry5qgnqxxrjxaii@...utronix.de
Anyway, if this really happens, then it means try_fill_recv() can be
called concurrently for the same rq, which looks like a far more severe
problem to me. If so, we need to fix it instead.

-- 
Toshiaki Makita