lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF=yD-Lqv4Drx3fpE2s1EYL8Ru_F2UjSuM56Ss27rGWWqmkWnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 21 Oct 2018 16:08:17 -0400
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:     Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        steffen.klassert@...unet.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 06/10] udp: cope with UDP GRO packet misdirection

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:31 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> In some scenarios, the GRO engine can assemble an UDP GRO packet
> that ultimately lands on a non GRO-enabled socket.
> This patch tries to address the issue explicitly checking for the UDP
> socket features before enqueuing the packet, and eventually segmenting
> the unexpected GRO packet, as needed.
>
> We must also cope with re-insertion requests: after segmentation the
> UDP code calls the helper introduced by the previous patches, as needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> ---

> +static inline struct sk_buff *udp_rcv_segment(struct sock *sk,
> +                                             struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +       struct sk_buff *segs;
> +
> +       /* the GSO CB lays after the UDP one, no need to save and restore any
> +        * CB fragment, just initialize it
> +        */
> +       segs = __skb_gso_segment(skb, NETIF_F_SG, false);
> +       if (unlikely(IS_ERR(segs)))
> +               kfree_skb(skb);
> +       else if (segs)
> +               consume_skb(skb);
> +       return segs;
> +}
> +
> +
> +void ip_protocol_deliver_rcu(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, int proto);
> +
> +static int udp_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +       struct sk_buff *next, *segs;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       if (likely(!udp_unexpected_gso(sk, skb)))
> +               return udp_queue_rcv_one_skb(sk, skb);
> +
> +       BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct udp_skb_cb) > SKB_SGO_CB_OFFSET);
> +       __skb_push(skb, -skb_mac_offset(skb));
> +       segs = udp_rcv_segment(sk, skb);
> +       for (skb = segs; skb; skb = next) {

need to check IS_ERR(segs) again?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ