netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Mark expected switch fall-throughs and fix missing break

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8189d36d-1e12-c16d-4cb7-9aeefea3a6ff@embeddedor.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:53:49 +0200
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Mark expected switch fall-throughs and fix missing
 break


On 10/22/18 4:36 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 10/22/18 7:49 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, this patchset aims
>> to mark multiple switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> Also, the second patch in this series fixes a missing break in switch.
> 
> Enabling that sounds like a great way to inflict pain and suffering.
> 

Not really. The -Wimplicit-fallthrough will be enabled until after all the
current warnings have been addressed.

There are 600 of these issues left. So, hopefully I will complete this task
during the next development cycle.

Thanks
--
Gustavo