[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <78db9445-b6bc-3c59-53f3-81f2849cd42d@fkie.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 07:22:29 +0200
From: Henning Rogge <henning.rogge@...e.fraunhofer.de>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [rtnetlink] Potential bug in Linux (rt)netlink code
Does anyone else have an idea how to debug this problem?
Henning Rogge
Am 15.10.2018 um 07:25 schrieb Henning Rogge:
> Am 12.10.2018 um 20:51 schrieb Stephen Hemminger:
>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 09:30:40 +0200
>> Henning Rogge <henning.rogge@...e.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am working on a self-written routing agent
>>> (https://github.com/OLSR/OONF) and am stuck on a problem with netlink
>>> that I cannot explain with an userspace error.
>>>
>>> I am using a netlink socket for setting routes
>>> (RTM_NEWROUTE/RTM_DELROUTE), querying the kernel for the current routes
>>> in the database (via a RTM_GETROUTE dump) and for getting multicast
>>> messages for ongoing routing changes.
>>>
>>> After a few netlink messages I get to the point where the kernel just
>>> does not responst to a RTM_NEWROUTE. No error, no answer, despite the
>>> NLM_F_ACK flag set)... but sometime when (during shutdown of the routing
>>> agent) the program sends another route command (most times a
>>> RTM_DELROUTE) I get a single netlink packet with a "successful" response
>>> for both the "missing" RTM_NEWROUTE and one for the new RTM DELROUTE
>>> sequence number.
>>>
>>> I am testing two routing agents, each of them in a systemd-nspawn based
>>> container connected over a bridge on the host system on a current Debian
>>> Testing (kernel 4.18.0-1-amd64).
>>>
>>> I am directly using the netlink sockets, without any other userspace
>>> library in between.
>>>
>>> I have checked the hexdumps of a couple of netlink messages (including
>>> the ones just before the bug happens) by hand and they seem to be okay.
>>>
>>> When I tried to add a "netlink listener" socket for futher debugging (ip
>>> link add nlmon0 type nlmon) the problem vanished until I removed the
>>> listener socket again.
>>>
>>> Any ideas how to debug this problem? Unfortunately I have no short
>>> example program to trigger the bug... I have rarely seen the problem for
>>> years (once every couple of months), but until a few days ago I never
>>> managed to reproduce it.
>>>
>>> Henning Rogge
>>
>> Are you reading the responses to your requests? If you don't read
>> the response, the socket will get flow blocked.
>
> Yes, I do...
>
> all netlink sockets the program uses are constantly watched for traffic
> coming from the kernel (with an epoll()-based event loop, no edge-trigger).
>
> I even have a rate limitation towards the kernel, only sending a
> "pagesize" full of netlink data towards the kernel, then waiting for the
> reply before sending more (I had the blocking problem a few years ago
> when experimenting with LOTS of routes).
>
> Henning Rogge
Henning Rogge
--
Diplom-Informatiker Henning Rogge , Fraunhofer-Institut für
Kommunikation, Informationsverarbeitung und Ergonomie FKIE
Kommunikationssysteme (KOM)
Zanderstrasse 5, 53177 Bonn, Germany
Telefon +49 228 50212-469
mailto:henning.rogge@...e.fraunhofer.de http://www.fkie.fraunhofer.de
Powered by blists - more mailing lists