lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87efcgfltr.fsf@toke.dk>
Date:   Tue, 23 Oct 2018 22:29:52 +0200
From:   Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        "netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
        "brouer\@redhat.com" <brouer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel oops with mlx5 and dual XDP redirect programs

Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com> writes:

> On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 12:10 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com> writes:
>> 
>> > On Thu, 2018-10-18 at 23:53 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> > > Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com> writes:
>> > > 
>> > > > I think that the mlx5 driver doesn't know how to tell the other
>> > > > device
>> > > > to stop transmitting to it while it is resetting.. Maybe tariq
>> > > > or
>> > > > Jesper know more about this ?
>> > > > I will look at this tomorrow after noon and will try to
>> > > > repro...
>> > > 
>> > > Hi Saeed
>> > > 
>> > > Did you have a chance to poke at this? :)
>> > 
>> > HI Toke, yes i have been planing to respond but also i wanted to
>> > dig
>> > more,
>> > 
>> > so the root cause is very clear.
>> > 
>> > 1. core 1 is doing tx_dev->ndo_xdp_xmit()
>> > 2. core 2 is doing tx_dev->xdp_set() //remove xdp program.
>> 
>> Right, it was also my guess that it was related to this interaction.
>> Thanks for looking into it!
>> 
>> > and the problem is beyond mlx5, since we don't have a way to tell a
>> > different core/different netdev to stop xmitting, or at least
>> > synchronize with it.
>> 
>> Hmm, ideally there should be some way for the higher level XDP API to
>> notice this and abort the call before it even reaches the driver on
>> the
>> TX side, shouldn't there? At LPC, Jesper and I will be talking about
>> a
>> proposal for decoupling the ndo_xdp_xmit() resource allocation from
>> loading and unloading XDP programs, which I guess could be a way to
>> deal
>> with this as well.
>> 
>> In the meantime...
>> 
>
> Yes totally agree, this is why my fix is temporary. 
> Good Idea about LPC, let's discuss this there.
>
>> > I will be waiting for your confirmation that the fix did work.
>> 
>> I tested your patch, and it does indeed fix the crash. However, it
>> also
>> seems to have the effect that the XDP redirect continues to function
>> even after removing the XDP program on the target device.
>> 
>> I.e., after the call to ./xdp_fwd -d $TX_IF, I still see packets
>> being
>> redirected out $TX_IF. Is this intentional?
>> 
>
> Interesting, shouldn't happen, unless there is something weird going on
> when running xpd_fwd -d together with xdp_redirect_map, i just checked
> the code and if ndo_xdp_set was called with null program we will remove
> xdp tx resources, nothing suspicious in the driver.
>
> I will look at this later this week.

Cool. Let me know if you need anything more from me :)

-Toke

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ