netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] wireless: mark expected switch fall-throughs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0b3197a734f71bdfffaf717e63b17e2fe31720a2.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Tue, 23 Oct 2018 09:01:57 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wireless: mark expected switch fall-throughs

On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 02:13 +0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
> 
> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
> 
> This code was not tested and GCC 7.2.0 was used to compile it.

Look, I'm not going to make this any clearer: I'm not applying patches
like that where you've invested no effort whatsoever on verifying that
they're correct.

johannes