netdev - [PATCH bpf 7/7] bpf: make direct packet write unclone more robust

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181024200549.8516-8-daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Wed, 24 Oct 2018 22:05:49 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     ast@...nel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH bpf 7/7] bpf: make direct packet write unclone more robust

Given this seems to be quite fragile and can easily slip through the
cracks, lets make direct packet write more robust by requiring that
future program types which allow for such write must provide a prologue
callback. In case of XDP and sk_msg it's noop, thus add a generic noop
handler there. The latter starts out with NULL data/data_end unconditionally
when sg pages are shared.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c |  6 +++++-
 net/core/filter.c     | 11 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 5fc9a65..171a2c8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5709,7 +5709,11 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	bool is_narrower_load;
 	u32 target_size;
 
-	if (ops->gen_prologue) {
+	if (ops->gen_prologue || env->seen_direct_write) {
+		if (!ops->gen_prologue) {
+			verbose(env, "bpf verifier is misconfigured\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
 		cnt = ops->gen_prologue(insn_buf, env->seen_direct_write,
 					env->prog);
 		if (cnt >= ARRAY_SIZE(insn_buf)) {
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 3fdddfa..cd648d0 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -5644,6 +5644,15 @@ static bool sock_filter_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
 					       prog->expected_attach_type);
 }
 
+static int bpf_noop_prologue(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf, bool direct_write,
+			     const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+	/* Neither direct read nor direct write requires any preliminary
+	 * action.
+	 */
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int bpf_unclone_prologue(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf, bool direct_write,
 				const struct bpf_prog *prog, int drop_verdict)
 {
@@ -7210,6 +7219,7 @@ const struct bpf_verifier_ops xdp_verifier_ops = {
 	.get_func_proto		= xdp_func_proto,
 	.is_valid_access	= xdp_is_valid_access,
 	.convert_ctx_access	= xdp_convert_ctx_access,
+	.gen_prologue		= bpf_noop_prologue,
 };
 
 const struct bpf_prog_ops xdp_prog_ops = {
@@ -7308,6 +7318,7 @@ const struct bpf_verifier_ops sk_msg_verifier_ops = {
 	.get_func_proto		= sk_msg_func_proto,
 	.is_valid_access	= sk_msg_is_valid_access,
 	.convert_ctx_access	= sk_msg_convert_ctx_access,
+	.gen_prologue		= bpf_noop_prologue,
 };
 
 const struct bpf_prog_ops sk_msg_prog_ops = {
-- 
2.9.5