netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: phy-c45: Implement reset/suspend/resume callbacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5e65254c-04dc-6dba-eb1c-10bafadf95c5@synopsys.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:50:03 +0100
From:   Jose Abreu <jose.abreu@...opsys.com>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Jose Abreu <jose.abreu@...opsys.com>
CC:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Joao Pinto <joao.pinto@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: phy-c45: Implement reset/suspend/resume
 callbacks



On 23-10-2018 11:58, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:28:09AM +0100, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> On 23-10-2018 11:20, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> I have no idea what you're proposing there - your patches weren't copied
>>> to me.
>> They just set / unset  MDIO_CTRL1_LPOWER bit in PCS. I find that
>> without this remote end doesn't detect link is down ...
>>
>> If it's okay for Generic 10G driver I can submit only this and
>> manually reset PHY in stmmac driver so that I don't need to
>> implement custom PHY driver ...
>
>
>> BTW, I just found out currently Generic 10G Driver is broken
>> without patch 4/4 of this series [1]
>>
>> [1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.ozlabs.org_patch_987570_&d=DwIBAg&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=WHDsc6kcWAl4i96Vm5hJ_19IJiuxx_p_Rzo2g-uHDKw&m=zYEDSMZPTCHiPc_3B8buyu0kXnlIEYawnHWAxPrsoSU&s=MlF6I2cBSYkGxgEwNV-hXpXJIvXv_gRYXP-CazjkUSw&e=
> How is it broken - what are the symptoms?
>
> The generic 10G driver is bound not via the normal bus matching and
> phy_bus_match(), but via a manual bind in phy_attach_direct().  This
> calls the probe function, which is phy_probe(), which initialises
> the supported/advertising to the driver's features (which as you note
> are zero.)

Since 719655a14971 ("net: phy: Replace phy driver features u32
with link_mode bitmap"), phy_probe() calls
ethtool_convert_link_mode_to_legacy_u32() with phydrv->features
as argument. Since features are NULL, we will get NULL pointer
dereference.

I guess Generic 10G driver was forgotten in the conversion.

Thanks and Best Regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu

>
> However, phy_attach_direct() goes on to call phy_init_hw(), which
> calls the config_init() method.  The config_init() method initialises
> the supported/advertising masks to 10GbaseT.  This is (partly) what
> I refer to when I say that the generic 10G support is crippled - it
> only supports this single speed and media.
>
> So the supported/advertising masks should be forced to only 10GbaseT
> at the completion of phy_attach_direct().
>
> The "generic 10G" support doesn't do autonegotiation, configuration
> or link mode forcing.  It only assumes 10GbaseT is supported, and
> only checks for the "link up" bits.
>
> It isn't like the non-10G generic PHY support due to history - it
> was added in 2014 by Andy Fleming (see 124059fd53af).
>
> BTW, your patch 1 is wrong as well (introducing phy_update_link()).
> You don't take account that a 10G phy may have alternative ways of
> reading the link (like 88x3310 does, because it has multiple
> instances of AN/PCS/PHYXS at 1k offsets.)  All the gen10g_*
> functions are legacy functions for the crippled "generic" 10G
> support.
>