lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181025032016.GA25756@1wt.eu>
Date:   Thu, 25 Oct 2018 05:20:16 +0200
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
        Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, wanghaifine@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKP <lkp@...el.com>, Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change judgment len position

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 07:41:52PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> The Code of Conduct, if it exists at all, should apply
> to all of the kernel.
> 
> And no, as I have previously posted, I don't agree with
> it nor the method that was used to introduce it.
> 
> But it does exist.
> Its splatter affects us all.

Then just like any rule, start to use it as a guideline and not as
something extremely strict to apply to others. If someone feels
offended he can complain, there's no reason for suggesting that
maybe someone else could have felt offended, otherwise we'll end
up with a new code of thinking to explain how to think what others
could feel like...

Willy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ